Wed
Jul 27 2011 3:00pm

Harlequin Historicals—Anything But Regencies, Please!

George Prior to getting accepted into library school, I spent my college undergraduate years studying British history. My studies pretty much ranged from Henry VIII to World War II, and to be honest, the Regency was never a particular favorite. It was okay, I guess.

Which should tell you how fun it was for me when Regency Everything took over historical romance, oh, just about the time I was rediscovering the sub-genre.

It didn’t take long for me to hit burn out. It got so bad that one more mention of Beau Brummell, Prinny, or the sucky lemonade at Almack’s was likely to push me right over the edge. The quandary, of course, is that I love historical romance—and with the Regency era going great guns, it meant a lot of authors and publishers were leaving settings they previously had made camp in to defect to across the pond.

What was a poor Regency-burnt-out reader to do? Well, I discovered the Harlequin Historical line. I firmly credit this category romance line for keeping me sane during the Great Regency Flood of the Aughts. Bless them and the horses they rode in on.

Surrender to an Irish Warrior by Michelle WillinghamWhat I love about Harlequin Historical is that they routinely give readers a variety of time periods and settings every single month. Yes, they do publish books set in Regency England, but they also publish westerns, medievals, Victorians, and even less “marketable” eras and settings like Vikings, ancient Rome, the Caribbean, China, and Arabia.

Clocking in at just under 300 pages, readers can expect to find interesting historical detail, and a compelling romance within the pages of an HH. The sensuality level typically tends to sit around mainstream romance novel heat, about PG-13. However, there are some authors, namely a few of the western writers, who turn the thermostat down to around PG.

This line kept me in historical westerns when so many other publishers were abandoning them outright in favor for what was selling hot at the moment. Not only that, but during a time when digital publishing hadn’t completely taken off yet, this line was how readers found the occasional historical that wasn’t set in either America or England.

Prairie Wife by Cheryl St. JohnFor all those reasons and more, I still find myself hopelessly devoted to Harlequin Historical. I owe them not only many hours of reading enjoyment, but my very sanity as well.

Recommended Reading:
Innocent in the Sheikh’s Harem by Marguerite Kaye
Surrender to an Irish Warrior by Michelle Willingham
From Waif to Gentleman’s Wife by Julia Justiss
The Last Rake in London by Nicola Cornick
Prairie Wife by Cheryl St. John

George “Beau” Brummell, watercolor by Richard Dighton (1805) via Wikimedia Commons


 

Wendy Crutcher, Fighting For Truth, Justice and the Right to Read What You Want

Subscribe to this conversation (must be logged in):
Individual - You will receive an alert for each comment added to this post.
Digest - You will receive an end-of-day alert for all comments added to this post.
12 comments
kendralou
1. kendralou
Amen, Wendy! I love finding a romance with unusual settings or a subgenre that's not the latest craze. I like to mix up my romances, not sticking with one author, setting, or time period. I hate it when it seems like every new romance published sounds just like the one next to it. (Actually I hate it for every genre, not just romance.)
Diane Gaston
2. DianeGaston
As a Harlequin Historical author of Regency Historicals (most of which deal with other things besides Brummell, Prinny, or the lemonade at Almacks) , I, too, am very proud that the line features a variety of time-periods and settings. Harlequin Historical is not afraid to try something new, such as Michelle Willingham's Irish Medievals or Jeannie Lin's Chinese settings. And I'm proud that they kept publishing Westerns when all other publishers were abandoning them. I couldn't agree with you more on that score, Wendy!

Not everyone loves the historical era that I love! But there truly is something for everyone at Harlequin Historical!
kendralou
3. HannahI
Thanks for the post, Wendy!
I'd love to know the name of the HH set in the Caribbean. As a follow-up, do you know a good resource to search for books by era or setting?
kendralou
4. Blythe Gifford
Thanks for your kind words! As one of those Harlequin Historical writers who writes time periods OTHER than Regency, you've made my day! Variety is the spice of the line. (My particular time period is 14th century medieval.) So glad to help you hold on to your sanity. And your reading enjoyment.
kendralou
5. Cheryl St.John
Thank you, Wendy! HH lovers unite! lol
kendralou
6. Dr J
Oh, how I agree. I think most people remember the short novels that were sort of all written according to a simple formula and were primarily contemporary romances. But their historicals were stellar--such good reading and not a lot money invested. When my kids were little and we were nearly starving on my hubby's job and paying college tuition for him, it was really special to be able to find some very good books at a really good price, and know that there was great variety when many publishing houses were stuck on the current publishing fad, whatever it may have been. Thanks for your good blog posts.
Wendy the Super Librarian
7. WendyCrutcher
Kendra: I can't read a steady diet of anything - even historical western romances, which I love, love, love! I need to mix it up to keep my grey matter nimble :)

Diane: And now that my Regency Burn Out has lifted (another blog post on that is in the pipeline) I find myself
discovering a lot of the wonderful authors that work in that time period. I'm late to the party, but hey, at least I eventually got there ;)

Hannah: The Caribbean book I was thinking of when I wrote this post is High Seas Stowaway by Amanda McCabe. It came out in 2009, so you'll definitely be able to buy it in digital, and should be able to scare up a print copy easily enough at the library or used. And sadly, I don't have a good resource for settings/time periods! I wish I did. Just a lot of hunting and pecking on my own.

Blythe: Medieval is one time period I didn't used to naturally gravitate towards, but I've read some real
goodies in the last year or so. I'm starting to get more adventurous!

Cheryl: I discovered the HH line through the western authors. I think Judith Stacy was the first author I read? Followed closely by you - the book in question being Joe's Wife :)

Dr. J: And I like that every month there's always variety. You don't get all Regency one month and all western the next. As the reader, you always have the opportunity to pick
and choose depending on what your mood is at that moment.
Louisa Cornell
8. Louisa
Wendy, if you want great, NOT incipient Regencies, you can't go wrong with anything by the Divine Diane Gaston ! AND try Ann Lethbridge's books, especially The Gamekeeper's Lady and More Than a Mistres, both great reads! And Terri Brisbin's Highlanders always deliver! Her latest - His Enemy's Daughter is another wonderful read!
Wendy the Super Librarian
9. WendyCrutcher
Louisa: Diane is one of the Regency authors I need to catch up with! Her latest is locked, loaded and ready to roll on my Sony Reader. I've also read Ann Lethbridge. Discovered her via the short story Undone line. Really like her writing style, must read more of hers. Terri's another one I haven't tried yet - but I have several friends who really like her books.
kendralou
10. jamieguo
HannahI, try this link http://www.eyeonromance.com/ and press on browse by sub genre to find books by countries, themes and so on.
Teresa Nielsen Hayden
11. tnh
Wendy, do you have any idea what brought on the Great Regency Flood of the Aughts? I know that for a while there, some romance publishers were indiscriminately throwing every Regency or quasi-Regency they could lay hands on at that market, from Georgette Heyer reprints (typeset from careless later paperback editions that collated all the corrupt texts from their predecessors) to new titles that should never have seen light of day.

The latter category included a book that was going hand-to-hand among Regency fans in the industry. The stupidity in it was fractal: the closer you looked at it, the more of it there was. My favorite detail was the hero's best friend's ancestral castle, which had been built in the 15th C. by the Normans. We decided the Normans were a family of building contractors.

I won't go into the parts of the storyline that induced a state of brain-whiteout, and caused me to avoid historical romances for a couple of years lest it happen again.

But I digress. Anyway: why were they so desperate to publish Regency romances?
Wendy the Super Librarian
12. WendyCrutcher
TNH: Part of it I think was supply and demand. The other part of it? Trying to catch lightning in a bottle. Inevitably when one author "hits" with something - then publishers are hot to find someone else who can work the same sort of formula to score a hit. A good non-romance example? Look at all those Da Vinci Code knock-offs that followed after Dan Brown. Or how much paranormal is in YA market place right now. For the Great Regency Flood Of The Aughts - I give you two examples. Julia Quinn's The Duke and I (the first in the Bridgerton series) was published in 2000, and the series didn't wrap up until 2006. Then you have Stephanie Laurens' Bar Cynster books. The first one actually launched in 1998 - but she's kept them going on longer than the Energizer Bunny - with two more books in the series due out this fall. Between the connected books/series thing, and both being set in the Regency era thing? It was inevitable. And lest anyone think I'm picking on the Regency era - you can pretty much do this across the board in publishing. Swedish suspense novels? Paranormal romance? Urban fantasy? Pick your poison.
Post a comment