Fri
May 6 2011 10:00am

Where’s the Beef?: Dead Reckoning by Charlaine Harris Makes Me Ranty

Dead Reckoning by Charlaine HarrisI managed to get my hands on an advance copy of Charlaine Harris's Dead Reckoning and after finishing it all I could say was “WTF?”

I can’t say I’m surprised; the Sookie Stackhouse Series has been doing downhill for some time now, but I can’t seem to stop myself from reading them. It’s kinda like a car crash on the highway: You just gotta look. Yes, I’m a lookie loo. Sue me.

The very first paragraph had me utterly confused; Sookie says it’s been two years since her grandmother’s death. Wait, WHAT?  All these books later and it’s only been two years! Two years and all that drama; glad I’m not Sookie. Okay, so maybe it’s a continuity error? Who knows.

Really, how many times can Sookie go through the same damn danger and not die? To me, this series continuously puts Sookie in danger and somehow she doesn’t get as much as a scratch. She gets rid of one enemy, only to have that enemy return a few books later. Ugh.

Never mind this girl is always conflicted about something or other, but never does anything about it. We have the back and forth about Eric and Sookie’s relationship and their vampire marriage. Either get it together or break up already! Yet Sookie and Eric still have time for some weird “monkey sex” on a porch swing that ends with Sookie icing her lady bits. Umm OWW on so many levels.  *Shivers*

The weirdest—in my opinion biggest load of doo-doo—was the scene at Bill’s house (I keep wanting to call him Vampire Bill). Sookie is being chased through a storm and runs to Bill’s place. Bill is sound asleep in his hidey-hole, so that’s where Sookie is determined to hide. But she doesn’t want to leave a trail for her attackers so she strips. She takes off ALL of her clothing and hides it in a bush then runs to the hidey-hole NAKED and climbs on in. Bill doesn’t say a single thing, 'cause he’d dead to the world but manages to wake up and still not ask why his ex-girlfriend is naked in his hidey-hole. **Sidenote: Sookie’s feet are somehow dry and don’t leave wet marks. That’s talent, folks.**

What I’d really like to know is why Sookie is always dressed circa 1984 when her friend Tara (no, not the same Tara from the HBO series True Blood) owns a clothing store? Can’t she help a friend out? Why do we have to hear what Sookie is wearing all the time? Give the girl some Dior, and then we can talk clothing.

I think Charlaine Harris just keeps trying to up the WTF ante, but there is no particular reason why the hell all this weird stuff is going on, and really there’s no point. It’s like she’s trying to compete with the TV version or has became influenced by it. She’s gotten timelines confused and totally re-written things that are different in Dead Reckoning than what they were in previous books.

I need a resolution—hell I needed one five books ago.  Or at least give me more True Blood, because I don’t know how much longer I can take this dragging-out deal we have going here. I’ve heard 1-3 more books in the series and I am holding out hope that that’s the truth.

Did you read Dead Reckoning yet? Did you love it or hate it? 


 

Natasha Carty reviews Paranormal Romance and Urban Fantasy on her website Wicked Little Pixie and lives in Toronto, Canada, with her cat, Seamus.

Subscribe to this conversation (must be logged in):
Individual - You will receive an alert for each comment added to this post.
Digest - You will receive an end-of-day alert for all comments added to this post.
22 comments
torifl
1. torifl
I haven't read Dead Reckoning yet but I have been unhappy since the last 2 installemnts. It's like a huge cheesy soap opera. Sookie seems to get whiner and whiner. Nothing changes but the location.

And yes, her clothing. Girl needs a make over STAT.
torifl
2. Scooper
I was pissed when I finished Dead Reckoning. WTH happened? The scene at Bill's house irked me, the baby shower about drove me mad and the final scene with Eric.... Why does Sookie keep turning a blind eye to all the danger surrounding her? After this book I'm kinda glad the series is winding to a close.
torifl
3. Sookie65
Just finished reading this last night...were we reading the same book?? I absolutely loved it and can't help thinking you are being overly-critical. Sookie has always described her clothes in detail, so why are you complaining about it now? The sex scenes are not overly graphic, even the "monkey sex" is fairly tame in my humble opinion, which is totally Charlaine Harris's style, so I don't see a problem there (except I would have liked them to be more graphic, lol). If you re-read the excerpt where she takes all her clothes off at Vampire Bill's house, she explains that she jumps onto a runner inside the hall,because her feet ARE wet, and she leaves a tiny drip on the floor boards.
Surely the whole premise of the books is that Sookie is always in danger because of her life choices?? Also, I don't feel that Ms Harris is confusing the books with the series at all, perhaps you are doing that? This book explains a lot more about Sookie's Fairy background, and we finally learn why she is telepathic (and why none of her close relatives are).
I have to say that I did enjoy this book much more than the last one and I am really looking forward to the next instalment.
torifl
4. katjameson
This isn't the only series that does exactly what you've described. I'm with you on the unbeliavability of a heroine being constantly in danger at every turn. Even if your life is truly in the toilet you catch a break once in a while. Now I'll confess that I haven't read this series because they never appealed to me and I've read a very broad range of paranormal from fang dripping demons to snarky vampires. But heh kudos to the author, she found a market and rode it all the way to an HBO show that would be more aptly titled True Sex.
torifl
5. dawn8226
I'm planning to start reading Dead Reckoning today, but I'm just not that excited since the last couple of books haven't been that great. I think the series needs to end, its slowing dying. But your review is making me want to start reading, if for no other reason then to see how many WTF moments there are. LOL "Monkey sex" does not sound good. Ouch.
Natasha Carty
6. WickedLilPixie
@ Tori - It is like a soap!

@ Scooper - I'm still confused by the Bill thing.

@ Sookie65 - Nope I'm not confusing anything, there are continuity errors. And this is why we have reviews, everyone has a different opinion.

@ Dawn - LOL I'd say read it but know it's a bit better then the last ones but still a WTF read.
torifl
7. Seleste deLaney
This post isn't the first complaint I've heard about the series recently (one reason I'm glad I never really connected with Sookie enough to read more than the first one). Issues like these are why it's better (IMO) for an author to have a plan from the beginning and stop a series when it reaches a natural end rather than just continuing until people start to complain and then figure out a way to end it all. Die hard fans will always be die hard fans, but at a certain point for a lot of readers, "WTF?" turns rapidly into "Done".
Natasha Carty
8. WickedLilPixie
@ Seleste I totally agree! It's come to the point that I like the series on TV better
torifl
9. Teri C
I wanted some new plot brought on. Sure Sookie gets in danger, but half the time I felt she was moping around and saying 'woe is me' a lot. There wasn't a lot that was new. Sure people were using her. Sure it took her a bit to realize it. Sure she commented for like a page on her bathroom habits several times and then revisited her dead gran several times, but there was noting really new going on. When I have to hand down $28 for a book I want it to rock my evening. Not endint with WTF?! I hope the next two are freaking awesome Charlaine.
Natasha Carty
10. WickedLilPixie
@ Teri - I agree, it was rehashing a lot & closing only a few. But then adding more...which confuses me since its supposed to be ending!
torifl
11. AshleyG
Have you ever looked at Charlaine's schedule on her website? She spends so much time doing appearances since the success of True Blood I don't know how she finds any time to write at all. I thought the last two books were terrible compared to the previous books in the series and I'm not really all that excited about reading Dead Reckoning. I'm too invested in the characters at this point to quit reading but I'm ready to move on.
Natasha Carty
12. WickedLilPixie
@ Ashley thats a great point, I never have seen her schedule but it totally makes sense!
Pamela Webb-Elliott
13. Spaz
I really feel as though the last 2 books have suffered because all of her creative energy has gone to True Blood. I can see above that others are getting that feeling as well. From continuity errors to forcing the Fae mythology into the series when it just doesn't fit and is not well done, to overall losing the magic of the once charming series... this is the first time I haven't purchased a Sookie book on its release date :( I just realized this week when Tuesday came around that I just didn't care anymore about Sookie. The charisma and enchantment and even the humor that was there for books 1-6 is gone. I broke up with Sookie and don't care to see how it ends. Well, I might ask you how it ends cuz I know you'll read it :P But I'm not! There are just too many other good authors and series out there to continue my time with you Sookie! kthxbai
Natasha Carty
14. WickedLilPixie
@ Spaz car accident, lookie loo. That be me, I won't be able to not read it. So I will fill you in!
torifl
15. MistMiraHaven
I read the first two and am stuck at the third, having trouble moving forward. I think most girls would get attacked by the maenad and then say, "My life is out of control; I have to make some huge changes." I find the graphic sex situations disturbing, because there is no love involved (like when Sookie goes to Bill's house that first time and see the other vampire's who dropped in, or that orgy party, or when she was held captive in the church.) I find the sexually themed incidents disturbing. And the way she just seems to fall into bed with Bill from the beginning. I guess this series just isn't for me.
torifl
16. tom jord
i got my copy of dead reckoning from be4change.com – they have good
prices, ship fast and help others by investing in micro-finance
projects.

only 1/2 through and i cant put it down. i think you have to switch to a new genre if you want resolution and expect things to make sense :)
torifl
17. bungluna
I waited to post until I'd finished the book. I agree it's not the best in the series, but I don't see all the WTF points that seem to have riled so many readers.

I personally loathe the tv show. I watched the first season, lost interest half-way through the second and by the time the bull thing in the end came, I was over it. As these two are diametrically different, imo, perhaps there are indicators as to who will like the books and who will like the series, or both. For me, the amount of graphic sex and violence and preachiness in the show is unbearable. The amount of self-involved description and one pov is acceptable as entertainment for me. I'm sure there are other parallels and differences between the two venues. I consider the books better value for my time and money.
torifl
18. MichieP
I liked this one better than the previous two. Both of those left me with a feeling that they were lacking. This one did seem to be a bit better.

2 years ago, Ms. Harris signed a contract for 4 more books... which I was thrilled about at the time. Now... not so much. Let's hope the last 2 are TRULY the last 2.

She's already said Sookie will NOT become a vampire, and that's what I want to happen. Idk if anyone else is in agreement, but that's just my own wishful (albeit irrational) thinking.

Did anyone else notice an error, or am I reading it wrong? On pg 261, Sookie explains to Bill Eric's dilemma with Oklahoma, right? But she explains it again on pg. 304 and Bill is "shocked". What am I missing??

What will happen with Eric and Sookie?? That's my big question. Since Eric is my favorite character and I pretty much only ready the books because of him.

Lastly, I do like True Blood better than the books. That probably has something to do with Alex Skarsgard, though...
Liz Maverick
19. lizmaverick
@Sookie65 or anybody else who loved the book...we'd love to put up a blog article about that! Tell us why it works for you still. Please email me at liz. edelstein [at]macmillan.com

Thanks!

Liz
torifl
20. kaeboo
Having only read half of it so far. Ya I pre-ordered from wallysucks and it just came yesterday and I do have to work and take care of family. But so far I'm enjoying it. Yes, its over the top and soap operish but I love it!!! lol Doesn't it seem odd that suddenly Sam is just full of info that he's kinda secretive about? and that whole Bob the cat and the babies of the cat in the woods conversation between Sam & Sook was borderline ewwww! Which sleeping with your fae relatives is as well as would Sookie watchin her cousin strip would be!! lol It's not perfect but it's perfectly delish to me! I'm a huge TrueBlood fan as well....it's like non-stop Sookie in parallel worlds! :)
torifl
21. lemyn
I am obliged. I still enjoy reading them, however, ya wtf.
torifl
22. Angie_stl
I'm not sure if anyone is still reading comments on here but I'm going to throw my two cents into the ring.

The first time I read it, I wanted to throw my phone (ebook) across the room and then go stomp on the bits. I refrained, barely. I just recently, two months later, read it again, and whereas I wasn't shouting its praises from rooftops, I wasn't as angry as I was the first time. I also had quite a few WTF moments while reading it, and found more through a message board I was on before it was out and accidentally got a couple spoilers from Australians.

@MichieP I think one of the problems with her signing the contract for four more books is that she is trying to stretch what should be one or two books into four so there's way too much filler or just crap. And I totally caught the double explanation to Bill, but he is kinda dumb ?, I went back and forth reading them both trying to figure out why she was telling him twice. The only thing I can figure out is that she was overly vague the first time and was specific the second. But I really can't imagine Eric would want that info passed around. There were a couple other times that she repeated herself (in a different way than normal) or contradicted herself within DR. She makes me head hurt sometimes. And lastly, I'm not 100% convinced about the whole Sookie will never be a vamp thing. If that was her end game, because the interviews I've seen she's said she's known for a while how the series will end, there's no way she could say that yes Sookie could possible become a vamp without giving away the end. And as much as I love Eric (rawr)(and Alex, he makes for a delightful screensaver and home page on my phone) I don't see how Sookie could stay with him without becoming a vamp or having her fairy essence come out a lot stronger so that she could live at least a couple hundred years, and look young while she's living those years. A lot of people I've talked to think she'll end up with Sam, and all I can say to that is eeewwww!!
Post a comment