Thu
Mar 31 2011 4:00pm

The “Spin the Moon Out of the Sky” Scene in Joan Wolf’s His Lordship’s Mistress

His Lordship’s Mistress by Joan WolfHow often do we read a romance when it isn't fairly clear, fairly early on, that love and marriage is a possibility, even if a remote one? With a well-written mistress book in an aristocratic setting, a conventional happy ending should seem out of the question. According to Free Dictionary, the definition of a mistress is “A woman who has a continuing sexual relationship with a usually married man who is not her husband and from whom she generally receives material support." By that definition, actress Jessica O'Neill from Joan Wolf's His Lordship's Mistress certainly fits the bill: The Earl of Linton supports her financially and although he is single, he may as well have been married because of the disparity between their stations in life. Not sounding so much like a romance, is it?

But Jessica O'Neill is actually a gentlewoman, forced to earn a substantial amount of money very quickly so that she and her two young step-brothers — and all her dependents — will not lose the roof over their heads. She wants nothing more than to breed horses and live a quiet life in the country, but the debts she inherits from her step-father make that choice impossible. Jessica is fiercely independent and far too proud and fastidious to marry in order to ”save“ her family. Realistically, she is all too aware of a married woman's financial powerlessness. Her beauty and exquisite speaking voice propel her to the forefront of the London stage. There, in the infamous green room, she is introduced to a blond paragon, Philip, the young Earl of Linton.

He asks her, with delicacy and warmth, to allow him to take care of her and she accepts. They cross the Rubicon of her virginity and settle into a relationship that pleases them both. Unusually, the earl demands respect for Jessica from all his companions and they are seen everywhere together (everywhere, that is, except the haunts of the haut vol like Almacks and private entertainments).

Neither has ever spoken of love but in her signature, spare ”show, don't tell“ style, Joan Wolf makes it clear that deeper emotions are involved in this relationship. After a trip to his country seat, Philip and Jessica have a passionate reunion. She admits she has missed him and for the first time, she ”let her barriers down“ and thinks to herself that whatever happens, that she'll never forget this coming together. But wait:

Half an hour later she was closed up against him, watching him with open, remote eyes that filled his soul with bitter anger. He had given her a ruby-and-diamond necklace.

Why Jessica is so angry and why Philip is so bitter and hurt are at the crux of this love story. The aftermath of Philip's gift is awkward and fraught with tension: Jessica refuses to wear the necklace when Philip takes her to the opera; Philip thinks Jessica is about to embark on an affair with her actor colleague: and the estrangement culminates in Jessica telling Philip that she will leave him.

“Jess,” he finally said quietly, “why won’t you wear my necklace?”

She tore her eyes from him and turned to walk to the window. She rested her forehead against the cold glass and closed her eyes. “Because it makes me feel like a whore,” she said wearily, “Which is a very stupid reason, I know, since that is exactly what I am.”

There was a stunned silence, then he said in a voice that was barely audible, “Oh my God.” She didn’t move and he came across to where she stood at the window. “Do you think that is how I regard you?” There was a note in his voice that pierced the fog of despair that was engulfing her, and she turned slowly to face him.

“How do you regard me?” she asked simply, all defenses shattered.

“I regard you as the woman I love,” he answered, and reached out to pull her into his arms. The relief she felt was so intense that her knees buckled. He held her close and she pressed against him. She was shaking.

“Philip,” she said. “Philip.”

“I gave you that necklace because I love you,” he was saying. “I’d spin the moon out of the sky to give you if I thought you wanted it.”

“I just want you.” Her voice was muffled by his shoulder.

She felt so slim and light in his arms. “I’m sorry, Jess. I’m sorry, darling.” His lips were against her temple. Then, suddenly, his hands were hard on her shoulders, holding her away from him. She looked up to meet his eyes. They were bluer than the sea on a summer day, and deeper. “Don’t ever say that about yourself again. Do you hear me?”

For a mistress book to end convincingly—albeit never quite historically realistically—two crucial problems must be solved. The first, that the relationship shifts from a man supporting a woman financially, to a couple who love each other irrespective of their initial union. I would posit that this first problem is solved swooningly and convincingly in this scene. Many mistress books do not even explore this problem, choosing rather to take it for granted that the couple is ”in love."

The second difficulty, which questions whether the couple will be able to live with dignity and respect within their chosen community, is not the subject of this essay, though it diminishes the beloved mistress trope when it is almost taken for granted that all will be well within the confines of the aristocracy. If you want to know how Jessica and Philip achieve their HEA, you'll have to read this marvelous book.


 

Janet Webb, Book Lovers Resource

Subscribe to this conversation (must be logged in):
Individual - You will receive an alert for each comment added to this post.
Digest - You will receive an end-of-day alert for all comments added to this post.
19 comments
Keira Soleore
1. KeiraSoleore
Oh. My. God. I want to read this book. Now, would be good. I'm off to troll Amazon to see if I can find a copy.
Keira Soleore
2. KeiraSoleore
OK, I'm back. The book has been bought and is on it's way to me. Thank you, Janet.
Megan Frampton
3. MFrampton
@Keira, you won't regret it. When Janet and I were talking earlier about this, I was saying how much I loved Wolf's trads, and how much I also love her first-person historicals, at least the first three, maybe, of them? Her writing is exquisite.
Janet W
4. Janet W
I don't know anyone who doesn't love this book ... Jane wrote an exquisite review of it ... http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2009/10/23/review-his-lordships-mistress-by-joan-wolf/ ... I can't do justice to Wolf's prose style but spare, with so much unsaid, is definitely a hallmark of her Signet Regencies. Thrilled you found it Keira!
Janet W
6. Phyl
I love this book! Well said, Janet.
Janet W
7. Magdalen
Great post, Janet. But you know, I hadn't realized that she chose to say "whore." I really need to do a critical analysis on the historical use of that word. I suspect (without yet doing the research) that it's a modern author's shorthand for a condition that is degrading and demoralizing. But when I think how many other terms there were in early 19th century England for a woman who gets paid for sexual favors (light o' love, soiled dove, etc.) -- or at least, how many terms show up in the greater canon of Regency romances -- I wonder if "whore" got used among the gentry.
Janet W
8. bungluna
I've kept Joan Wolf's traditional romances in my keeper shelf for years, taking them with me wherever I've moved. The way she handles complex emotions believably in a limited format is one of the reasons why she's such a favorite. I like this one, but "A London Season" is my all-time favorite of hers.
Jessica Tripler
9. JessicaTripler
I have never even heard of this author before this post - another one to add to my "must read." I agree completely about those two obstacles, and with your sentiment that the journey to love is taken for granted too often. With a mistress scenario, there is always, of course, lust. And too often sex is a shorthand for love.

One mistress book I really like is "More Than A Mistress" by ... oh, who WAS that author? ;)
Janet W
10. Leigh D
Janet, what a great snapshot of one of Joan Wolf's great books. I can't tell you how many times I have re-read her books. She is an author of few words, but she has a way of pulling you in the story and touching your emotions.
Janet W
11. Janet W
Wait wait, don't tell me. Does it start with "b" ... but seriously Jessica, when you say "there is always, of course, lust" yeah, for sure, on the side of the man. No no tiptoeing away from this vast cravass ... I'm not saying the woman might NOT experience lust but if we're to grab an example for the o'euvre of that B writer, Pris of working girl fame wasn't getting too much of the it feels great from Gerald. I mean it seemed to be OK but well, I think I'll just wrap up and leave this for another discussion. Certainly most mistressy books have a fair amount of lust!
Megan Frampton
12. MFrampton
@JanetW and @JessicaTripler "leave this for another discussion"
Hm. I smell another blog post pending! Thanks for the inspiring conversation.
Miranda Neville
13. Miranda Neville
A lovely post, Janet, reminding me of a lovely moment in a lovely book. I have it somewhere on my shelves and may have to go and dig it out for a reread tonight. I love Joan Wolf. Her characters are never clichés and she's one of the sexier trad Regency writers :)

I cannot now remember how Jess's social rehabilitation was handled. It helped that she was well born, of course. I also suspect that the fact she'd been on the stage was more of a problem than the mistress thing. Marriage washed away a lot of pre-marital misbehavior.
Janet W
14. Janet W
Almost as good as re-reading an old fave is talking with friends about it and the icing is having someone find it for the first time: thank you all!

Questions ~ Jess's social rehabilitation was handled, as it so often is, by the ladies. Philip's sister was (for the purposes of this story) a Patroness of Almacks and she guaranteed that w/Jess's background, that all could be smoothed over.

Magdalen, of course I looked up the word "whore" instantly and it's been around since the 12th century. But you wondered if the author had made a 20th century stylistic error with putting that word into Jess's mouth. Well of course, how do I know :). I thought back to Pride and Prejudice -- Lydia, and Cotillion -- Kitty's bubble-headed blonde friend, both of them flirting around the edges of social ruin -- and their actions were alluded to and not labelled. As I recall. Keep in mind Jess was working day by day with actors, not a mealy-mouthed lot, and that she was a horse breeder. Perhaps Wolf thought that she would be the last character to reach for a euphemism. Lastly, she's a Shakespearian actress ... surely the Bard sprinkled around a whore or two in his speech. Interesting question.
Janet W
15. Magdalen
Janet -- Of course it's an old word, but Jessica uses it in a pejorative and self-demeaning way. My question is two-fold: First, during the Regency period did "whore" have the additional meanings Wolf (through Jessica) is relying on, or was it a fusty Shakespearean term that connoted something very different? And second, what's Jessica actually saying? We understand her to mean that the necklace (i.e., payment outside the morally-justified money she needs to save the farm) suddenly makes her feel cheap. But she's gentry -- would she really have caviled at the economics of the situation?

In other words, she's got a very modern and middle-class attitude toward a transaction that might have been viewed differently at the time. Yes, there was a huge divide -- then as now -- between a mistress and some slattern who takes on anyone with the few pennies she needs to buy some gin. But does it make sense for Jessica to think that she is no different from that slattern when she looks at an expensive necklace? I wonder if what she's really feeling is how different the gift of the necklace would be if she and Linton were in a sanctioned relationship. Instead of being a gift from a beloved, it's an expected token from one's protector -- commerce instead of generosity.

Now, in Joan Wolf's defense, I suspect that the shorthand is just fine. I actually have a more serious problem with the heavy reliance Balogh puts in the word "whore" to shock and dismay us as we're reading "The Secret Pearl."
Teresa Nielsen Hayden
16. tnh
Magdalen @7, whether or not "whore" would have been the common term among persons of that class (like us, they used it situationally), she's a woman who can at any time be called that. She has no legal protection, and no rights or dignity beyond what Philip chooses to grant her at any given moment.

It would rankle. Reminding him of that strikes me as an odd but real assertion of power on her part: she may be his kept mistress, but she's not obliged to lie about it.
Janet W
17. Rane Aria
I love these old school trads- and Joan Wolf is one of the best with  His Lordship Mistress. I though instead of going with the floe Jessica really stood on her own, instead of bowing down that I've seen other heroine's do.  The love between the two and how it blossoms is something so strong because of the trials they've gone through
Janet W
18. Janet W
Oh the courage Jessica demonstrated ... do you remember Philip telling his sister that Jessica had more courage in her little finger than most men had in their whole bodies? I have wonderful news -- which possibly everyone already knew -- 15 of her OOP books are available on Kindle. The Regencies are brilliantly priced too: $4.00.

Rane, I so agree with you, those old school trads are wonderful!
Janet W
19. Megan Mulry
Hooray! I loved this book! Am so grateful for Twitter and @JanetNorCal for introducing me to the wonderful Ms Wolf. Without having had read this blog, I referenced almost all the same lines via Twitter yesterday. The Whore word discussion is worthwhile in the abstract, but in the novel I think Wolf used it consciously and with perfect accuracy. At that moment the necklace is perceived by Jess as a blandishment devoid of any emotional significance. I have once in my life been on the receiving end of just such a gift (only sapphire earrings, but still) and whore is definitely the word for it when an expensive gift is not delivered with the requisite love. (Which only makes Linton that much more fabulous for how quickly he professes his true feelings...sigh) Thanks for the great post, the great read, and the great discussion. The Arrangement is on deck!
Post a comment