<i>One Night More</i>: Exclusive Excerpt One Night More: Exclusive Excerpt Mandy Baxter "She realized her lips had parted as though in anticipation of a kiss..." <i>Take Down</i>: Exclusive Excerpt Take Down: Exclusive Excerpt Mallery Malone "Little does Karina Armistead know, but Gabriel has decided that she will be his." <i>Lord Savage</i>: Exclusive Excerpt Lord Savage: Exclusive Excerpt Mia Gabriel "I instantly forgot everything except how he’d kissed me last night..." <i>Dark Blood</i>: Exclusive Excerpt Dark Blood: Exclusive Excerpt Christine Feehan "You can’t go around saying things like that to me when we have company."
From The Blog
August 29, 2014
Friday Beefcake: Back to School Edition 2014
Team H & H
August 29, 2014
You Down with OTP?
Sandy Hall
August 28, 2014
Alcoholic and Addicted Heroes
Willa aka willaful
August 27, 2014
Second Chances in Lori Foster’s No Limits
Tori Benson
August 27, 2014
The August 2014 Women’s Fiction Roundup
Leigh Davis
Showing posts by: Miranda Neville click to see Miranda Neville's profile
Wed
Jun 18 2014 4:00pm

Separated Spouses in Historicals from Balogh, Haymore, Guhrke, and More!

Lady Windermere's Lover by Miranda NevilleToday we welcome author Miranda Neville to Heroes and Heartbreakers. Miranda's forthcoming release, Lady Windermere's Lover, has a married couple who've been apart for a year (his choice, not hers!), only to find that when they do reunite, each has changed in the course of those twelve months. Miranda offers her thoughts on this beloved separated spouses trope, with some excellent examples of historical authors that use it flawlessly. Thanks, Miranda!

Sooner or later, I am convinced, every romance writer gets to every common trope, at least once. For me, with Lady Windermere’s Lover, it’s time for separated spouses and what happens when they meet again. As a storyline, it’s connected to estranged spouses, but not identical. Couples can be separated for reasons that have nothing to do with quarrels, or can be estranged but living in the same house. Writers like Sherry Thomas have almost made a career out of unhappily married couples, starting with her brilliant debut Private Arrangements. Most recently Laura Lee Guhrke tackled the subject with the intense How to Lose a Duke in Ten Days.

The writer I most associate with the trope is Mary Balogh, who has treated the subject on numerous occasions in many different ways. Among my favorites are two of her traditional Regencies. A Counterfeit Betrothal is in theory about the daughter of the couple, Sophia, who sets up a fake engagement in order to force her parents, separated for fourteen years, to meet again to plan the wedding. My goodness, Balogh packs a lot of plot into one slim volume. As a fan of the original Parent Trap movie as well as the children’s book it was based on, I very much enjoy the interfering child(ren) as means of reconciliation plot line.

[Turn that unnhapily-ever-after upside-down...]

Sat
Mar 9 2013 1:00pm

Author Miranda Neville and H&H’er Janet Webb on Mary Balogh’s Heroines

Tempting Harriet by Mary BaloghRecently, there was fast and furious discussion on Twitter DM on the topic of Mary Balogh’s heroines. They have the reputation for being a) too good to be true b) Mary Sues and c) tepid rather than torrid. Janet Webb kicked these canards around with historical writer Miranda Neville, another fan of Balogh’s traditional Regencies. Is the rap on these heroines true, false or somewhere in between?

The books discussed: Tempting Harriet, Snow Angel and The Incurable Matchmaker. If you’d like to refresh your memory on the plots, the following summaries are from Mary Balogh’s website.

Tempting Harriet: Once, when she was a mere lady's companion, Harriet Pope had spurned the attempted seduction of the Duke of Tenby. Now, six years later, she is the wealthy, titled widow of an older man, and she is the one who sets out to seduce* the duke. Yet when she succeeds, it is to the discovery that an affair is not what she wants after all. An affair, though, seems to be all Tenby can offer.

*It may be that this synopsis overstates how much Harriet is the seducer. True, she jumps to the conclusion that he is asking her to become his mistress and agrees, but she doesn’t make the first move.

[Where's the fun in that...]